Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Flanagan v Gwydir Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1608 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 10 September, 19, 25 October, 18 November & 9 December 2016 Date of orders: 09 December 2016 Decision date: 09 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Continued use of the property as an animal breeding/training facility & build a number of associated structures, compliance with animal welfare codes, animal waste control, noise, public interest, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MICHAEL FLANAGAN (Applicant)
GWYDIR SHIRE COUNCIL (Respondent)Representation: Mr G Hoddle, Carneys Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Mr S Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/163232 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. DA-11/2015 for an animal boarding or training establishment being a dog breeding facility on Part Lot 95 DP 554861 also known as 556 Onus Road Copeton is approved subject to the conditions of development consent set out in Annexure “A”.
…………….
Acting Commissioner Hussey
163232.16 Hussey (C) (291 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Michael Flanagan v Gwydir Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1608
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1608
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the Gwydir Shire Council had the authority to issue the permit under the relevant legislation. Additionally, the court needed to assess if the council's actions were procedurally fair and in line with the statutory requirements. It was also necessary to examine whether the council had breached any statutory duties owed to the plaintiff. These questions hinged on the interpretation of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) and associated regulations.
In its decision, the court meticulously reviewed the relevant statutory provisions and the council's procedural steps. The court found that the council had indeed issued the permit within its statutory powers and had followed the necessary procedures. The analysis included a detailed examination of the council's decision-making process and the evidence provided. The court concluded that the council had not acted unlawfully and that the permit was validly issued. Therefore, the plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
The final orders of the court were that the plaintiff's claims against the Gwydir Shire Council be dismissed with costs. The court determined that the council had not breached any statutory duties and had acted within its legislative authority. This ruling reinforces the importance of adherence to statutory processes and the limited scope of judicial review in local government decisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.