Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MHN Design Union Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1184 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 February and 12 April 2018 Date of orders: 26 April 2018 Decision date: 26 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MHN Design Union Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr David Rod, Spectrum Legal Group (Applicant)
Mr Adam Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/258991 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted to rely on the following documents that are the subject of Development Application No. DA-2750/2015/DA-BH:
Plan No.
Plan Name
Issue
Prepared by
Date
10.2_J
First Floor Plans
J
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd
29/03/2018
10.3_J
Second Floor Plans
J
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd
29/03/2018
10.4_J
Third Floor Plans
J
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd
29/03/2018
20.6 _G
West Elevation
G
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd
29/03/2018
30.12_B
Section E + Louvre Detail
B
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd
29/03/2018
The appeal is upheld.
Modification Application No. 189/2016/A to modify Development Consent No. DA-189/2016 granted by the Respondent on 8 November 2016 for the “demolition of existing structures, construction of a part 3/part 4 storey residential flat building containing 11 dwellings, semi-basement car parking for 20 vehicles, landscaping, strata subdivision and associated works (variation to floor space ratio control” at 5-7 Stark Street, Coogee (Lot 1 DP 1234566), by altering the layout of unit 1.01 to create 2 separate 2 bedroom units, and converting the north-facing balconies of units 2.03 and 3.02 to create a study for each unit, is determined by approving the modification as set out in Annexure “A”.
As a consequence of order (3), Development Consent No. DA-189/2016 is subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of consent as set out in Annexure “B”.
……………………….
Susan Dixon
Senior Commissioner of the Land & Environment Court
Annexure A (56.2 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (201 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- MHN Design Union Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1184
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1184
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the statutory framework governing the council's powers and the procedural requirements that must be satisfied before a council can issue an enforcement notice. It was necessary to determine whether the notice complied with the legislative provisions and whether the council's decision was lawful. The court held that the council had the power to issue an enforcement notice under the relevant section of the Local Government Act, provided the notice complied with the statutory requirements. However, the court found that the notice issued in this case was procedurally flawed as it did not include all the requisite information as stipulated by the Act. The council's failure to include the necessary details rendered the notice invalid.
As a result, the court granted the relief sought by MHN Design Union Pty Ltd, declaring the notice invalid. The court's decision emphasised the importance of adhering to the legislative requirements when issuing enforcement notices to ensure the protection of property owners' rights. The final orders of the court included a declaration that the notice issued by Randwick City Council was invalid, and no costs were awarded.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.