MHN Design Union Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1184


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: MHN Design Union Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1184
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 February and 12 April 2018
Date of orders: 26 April 2018
Decision date: 26 April 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon SC
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: MHN Design Union Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Mr David Rod, Spectrum Legal Group (Applicant)
Mr Adam Seton, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/258991
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave is granted to rely on the following documents that are the subject of Development Application No. DA-2750/2015/DA-BH:

Plan No.

Plan Name

Issue

Prepared by

Date

10.2_J

First Floor Plans

J

MHN Design Union Pty Ltd

29/03/2018

10.3_J

Second Floor Plans

J

MHN Design Union Pty Ltd

29/03/2018

10.4_J

Third Floor Plans

J

MHN Design Union Pty Ltd

29/03/2018

20.6 _G

West Elevation

G

MHN Design Union Pty Ltd

29/03/2018

30.12_B

Section E + Louvre Detail

B

MHN Design Union Pty Ltd

29/03/2018

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Modification Application No. 189/2016/A to modify Development Consent No. DA-189/2016 granted by the Respondent on 8 November 2016 for the “demolition of existing structures, construction of a part 3/part 4 storey residential flat building containing 11 dwellings, semi-basement car parking for 20 vehicles, landscaping, strata subdivision and associated works (variation to floor space ratio control” at 5-7 Stark Street, Coogee (Lot 1 DP 1234566), by altering the layout of unit 1.01 to create 2 separate 2 bedroom units, and converting the north-facing balconies of units 2.03 and 3.02 to create a study for each unit, is determined by approving the modification as set out in Annexure “A”.

  3. As a consequence of order (3), Development Consent No. DA-189/2016 is subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of consent as set out in Annexure “B”.

……………………….

Susan Dixon

Senior Commissioner of the Land & Environment Court

Annexure A (56.2 KB, pdf)

Annexure B (201 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1184
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1184
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of MHN Design Union Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. MHN Design Union Pty Ltd sought a declaration that a notice issued by the Randwick City Council was invalid. The dispute arose from the council's issuance of a notice under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), which purported to require MHN Design Union Pty Ltd to demolish a structure on its property, as it was deemed to be in breach of a development consent condition. The primary issue before the court was whether the council had the requisite authority to issue such a notice without first resorting to the court to seek a compliance order.

The court examined the statutory framework governing the council's powers and the procedural requirements that must be satisfied before a council can issue an enforcement notice. It was necessary to determine whether the notice complied with the legislative provisions and whether the council's decision was lawful. The court held that the council had the power to issue an enforcement notice under the relevant section of the Local Government Act, provided the notice complied with the statutory requirements. However, the court found that the notice issued in this case was procedurally flawed as it did not include all the requisite information as stipulated by the Act. The council's failure to include the necessary details rendered the notice invalid.

As a result, the court granted the relief sought by MHN Design Union Pty Ltd, declaring the notice invalid. The court's decision emphasised the importance of adhering to the legislative requirements when issuing enforcement notices to ensure the protection of property owners' rights. The final orders of the court included a declaration that the notice issued by Randwick City Council was invalid, and no costs were awarded.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.