Meyer (Migration)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 1884
•9 May 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Meyer (Migration) [2018] AATA 1884
[2018] AATA 1884
9 May 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application for an Aged Parent (Residence) (Class BP) visa, subclass 804. The applicant sought review of a decision not to grant the visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant satisfied the requirements of Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005, which relates to the cost of medical treatment in Australia.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the visa, finding that the applicant had not satisfied the requirements of PIC 4005. The Tribunal's decision was based on the applicant's failure to meet this criterion.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant satisfied the requirements of Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005, which relates to the cost of medical treatment in Australia.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant the visa, finding that the applicant had not satisfied the requirements of PIC 4005. The Tribunal's decision was based on the applicant's failure to meet this criterion.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Meyer (Migration) [2018] AATA 1884
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Ramlu v MIMIA
[2005] FMCA 1735
Ramlu v MIMIA
[2005] FMCA 1735
Robinson v MIMIA
[2005] FCA 1626