Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited Summary

[2014] FWCA 8205

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited
(AG2014/8154)

METSO MINERALS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (CANNING VALE OPERATIONS) AND NUW COMPREHENSIVE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Manufacturing and associated industries
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON	MELBOURNE, 19 NOVEMBER 2014

Application for approval of the Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited (Canning Vale Operations) and NUW Comprehensive Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited (Canning Vale Operations) and NUW Comprehensive Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 26 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 18 November 2017.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited, sought approval of a comprehensive enterprise agreement with NUW, representing the employees of the company’s Canning Vale operations. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically if it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The primary issue before the Commission was whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees, and if it provided for minimum standards as required by law.

The Commission examined the agreement to ensure it contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions, and assessed whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms. It also considered if the agreement complied with procedural fairness, ensuring that it was made in good faith and without coercion. The Commission reviewed the bargaining process and the content of the agreement, including provisions on pay rates, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It evaluated the fairness of these terms, taking into account the nature of the industry, the bargaining power of the parties, and the wider economic context.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. It determined that the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees and contained all the required minimum terms. The Commission noted the extensive and good faith bargaining process and found that the agreement met the legal criteria for approval. Consequently, the Commission approved the comprehensive enterprise agreement, ensuring that it would come into effect as per the specified date.

The final order of the Commission was that the Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited (Canning Vale Operations) and NUW Comprehensive Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved, effective from the date specified in the agreement. This decision ensured that the terms and conditions of employment for the employees were legally recognised and enforceable.

Metso Minerals (Australia) Limited

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established