| [2016] FWCA 4512 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A Metcash
(AG2016/3407)
METCASH FOOD & GROCERY PTY LTD AND NUW NSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 6 JULY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd and NUW NSW Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd and NUW NSW Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd t/a Metcash. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 May 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE419801 PR582483>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A Metcash [2016] FWCA 4512
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4512
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined several legal issues, including whether the agreement was made genuinely in the course of union representation, if it was fairly negotiated, and whether it met the criteria of being a "better off overall test" for employees. The court also considered whether the agreement contained terms that were contrary to public policy or that would undermine the fundamental rights of employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was genuinely made in the course of union representation and had been fairly negotiated. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the "better off overall test" and did not contain any terms that were contrary to public policy. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable and approved it under section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Commission's final order was that the Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd and NUW NSW Enterprise Agreement 2016 be approved. The agreement was to be registered and published in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The approval was effective from the date of the Commission's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.