DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A Campbells Wholesale
(AG2016/3102)

METCASH FOOD & GROCERY PTY LTD QUEENSLAND CONVENIENCE CHANNEL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT, 2016

Storage services
COMMISSIONER LEE	MELBOURNE, 9 JUNE 2016

Application for approval of the Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd Queensland Convenience Channel Enterprise Agreement, 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd Queensland Convenience Channel Enterprise Agreement, 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A Campbells Wholesale. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 June 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd trading as Campbells Wholesale, the applicant sought approval for the Queensland Convenience Channel Enterprise Agreement, 2016. The agreement was intended to govern the employment terms and conditions of certain employees within the applicant’s Queensland convenience store operations. The dispute arose from objections by various unions and employee representatives who claimed that the agreement did not adequately protect employees' rights and interests. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, which was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary standards for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues before the Commission involved whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, including provisions for wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The unions argued that the agreement did not sufficiently safeguard against unfair dismissal and did not provide adequate mechanisms for employee representation and consultation. The applicant, on the other hand, maintained that the agreement was fair and reasonable, offering a balanced approach that considered both employee welfare and business efficiency.

The Commission meticulously reviewed the agreement, assessing its provisions against the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that while the agreement contained several provisions that were beneficial to the employees, there were areas that needed improvement to ensure they met the statutory requirements for fairness and reasonableness. Specifically, the Commission identified issues with the provisions concerning the calculation of penalty rates and the procedures for resolving disputes. After considering the submissions from both sides, the Commission concluded that the agreement could be approved with certain modifications to address the identified deficiencies. The Commission thus directed the applicant to make the necessary amendments to the agreement before final approval could be granted.

Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A Campbells Wholesale

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established