Metcalfe v NZI Securities Australia Ltd
Case
•
[1995] FCA 386
•31 MAY 1995
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Metcalfe v NZI Securities Australia Ltd [1995] FCA 386
[1995] FCA 386
31 MAY 1995
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case, Metcalfe v NZI Securities Australia Ltd, involved a representative action brought under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976. The applicant, Mr Peter William Metcalfe, was the secretary of Ripoll Holdings Pty Ltd, a trustee of the DYV Unit Trust, which owned the land for the Dee Why Gardens Retirement Village. The Trust had entered into a loan facility agreement with NZI Capital Corporation Ltd, which later appointed a receiver to Ripoll. The applicant sought damages and relief under the Trade Practices Act 1974 for misleading and deceptive conduct by NZI Securities Australia Ltd and NZI Capital Corporation Ltd in relation to the term of the finance facility. The court found that NZI engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by failing to ensure that the facility agreement was drafted to accord with the terms of the facility letters. However, the court held that the applicant and the guarantors were not entitled to relief under the Trade Practices Act 1974 as they did not rely on the representations in the facility letters when executing their guarantees and mortgage. The only relief to which any group member was entitled was an award of damages under s.82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, in favour of Ripoll, in the sum of $314,000.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Consumer Law
-
Contract Law
Legal Concepts
-
Misrepresentation
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
-
Breach of Contract
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Terranova v Auxil Pty Ltd [2008] WADC 29
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Terranova v Auxil Pty Ltd
[2008] WADC 29
Bowler, Bruce William v Hilda Pty Ltd
[1996] FCA 928
Terranova v Auxil Pty Ltd
[2008] WADC 29
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
New South Wales Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd v Kuzmanovski
[2011] FCAFC 106
Burrell v The Queen
[2008] HCA 34