Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited

Case [2017] FWCA 2890


[2017] FWCA 2890
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited
(AG2016/6969)

MERCY HEALTH AND AGED CARE CENTRAL QUEENSLAND LIMITED & QNU - NURSING - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2017

Aged care industry

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 25 MAY 2017

Application for approval of the Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited & QNU - Nursing - Enterprise Agreement 2016-2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited & QNU – Nursing – Enterprise Agreement 2016-2017 (the Agreement). The application is made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Mercy Health & Aged Care Central Queensland Limited (Mercy Health). It is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] After reviewing the application and the Employer’s F17 Statutory Declaration, together with the terms and conditions contained in the proposed Agreement the Commission sought clarification about various matters. Further issues were also raised by the Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federation and the Queensland Nurses’ Union of Employees, who are Union bargaining representatives for the Agreement.

[3] A telephone conference was subsequently convened on 3 February 2017 with the intention of gaining a better understanding about the matters in dispute, and how the application might be progressed from this point. The Union bargaining representatives raised three issues, in particular, about the application and the terms and conditions contained in the Agreement. They, firstly, sought confirmation that the Agreement had been signed by an appropriate employee representative as required by Regulation 2.06A(2)(a)(ii). The second issue concerned the multi-hire arrangements contained in sub clause 4.5 of the Agreement. The final issue concerned the annual leave provisions contained in sub clause 7.1.2. The conference was concluded on the basis that Mercy Health and the Union representatives would now engage in further discussions with the intention of reaching agreement about undertakings that could respond to the concerns raised.

[4] In responding to the issue that has been raised about whether the Agreement has been signed by a “representative of the employees covered by the Agreement,” as required by Regulation 2.06A(2)(a)(ii), I have had regard to the decision handed down by Commissioner Lee in the matter of MSS Security Pty Ltd and the MSS Security Victorian Enterprise Agreement 2011 [2013] FWCA 1474. Commissioner Lee concluded that the “key consideration” in dealing with the issue of whether the application had been accompanied by a signed copy of the Agreement is whether the employee that signed the Agreement was in the class of employees that would be bound by the Agreement. He also noted that the legislation did not require that the employee signatory be a “bargaining representative.” I am satisfied, based on this decision, that the Commission does have a signed copy of the Agreement that meets the relevant requirements, given that the employee who signed the Agreement was at the time an employee who would be covered by the Agreement, if approved.

[5] Mercy Health has also now provided written undertakings. The Union bargaining representatives have also informed the Commission that they support the terms of these undertakings and believe the Agreement should now be approved. After reviewing the terms of those undertakings I am satisfied that they will not cause financial detriment to any employee to be covered, or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings, contained in Annexure “A,” are accordingly accepted and in accordance with s.191 of the Act will now be taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] I am otherwise satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 190, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[7] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and the Queensland Nurses’ Union of Employees, each being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers each of these organisations.

[8] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 June 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE424475  PR593229>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited [2017] FWCA 2890
Case
[2017] FWCA 2890
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited sought approval of their enterprise agreement with the Queensland Nurses Union. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission. The primary legal issue was whether the proposed agreement complied with the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, including provisions related to good faith bargaining, coverage of the agreement, and the rights of employees. The court had to determine if the agreement was fairly negotiated and if it met the necessary criteria for being made a registered agreement.

The Fair Work Commission examined the process of bargaining and the content of the agreement. It considered evidence regarding the fairness of the negotiation process, the extent to which the agreement covered all relevant employees, and whether it included all necessary terms and conditions. The Commission also evaluated whether the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits for employees, and if it adhered to the principles of the Act, including the protection of employees' rights and interests. The Commission concluded that the agreement met all statutory requirements and was fair and reasonable in its terms.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Mercy Health and Aged Care Central Queensland Limited & QNU - Nursing - Enterprise Agreement 2016-2017. The Commission found that the agreement was the result of good faith bargaining and satisfied all legal requirements under the Fair Work Act. The Commission also determined that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees, and that it met the statutory criteria for registration.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.