Mercantile Mutual Custodians Pty Ltd v Village Nine Network Restaurants & Bars Pty Ltd

Case

[1998] QSC 183

11 September 1998


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Mercantile Mutual Custodians Pty Ltd v Village Nine Network Restaurants and Bars Pty Ltd [1998] QSC 183 [1998] QSC 183 11 September 1998

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mercantile Mutual Custodians Pty Ltd sued Village Nine Network Restaurants & Bars Pty Ltd and others for breach of an agreement for lease. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants failed to proceed expeditiously in planning, obtaining necessary approvals, and effecting alterations in fitting out the premises. The defendants raised three issues for determination in their applications. Firstly, whether the plaintiff should be required to deliver a surrejoinder. Secondly, whether documents in respect of a mediation between the plaintiff and Concrete Constructions (Group) Limited are privileged. Lastly, whether certain documents are the subject of legal professional privilege. The court found that the plaintiff should not be required to deliver a surrejoinder, as it would not serve any useful purpose. The court also found that the objection on the basis of without prejudice privilege was well taken, and the summons was dismissed. The documents in question were limited to admissions which were truly concerned with negotiation and settlement. The court found that the privilege under consideration here was limited to admissions which are truly concerned with negotiation and settlement, and it was satisfied that the documents in question were properly the subject of such a privilege.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Discovery & Disclosure

  • Abuse of Process

  • Legal Privilege

  • Without Prejudice Privilege

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

5

Statutory Material Cited

0