Meramist Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 4276


[2024] FWCA 4276

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Meramist Pty Ltd

(AG2024/3777)

MERAMIST PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Meat Industry

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 4 DECEMBER 2024

Application for approval of the Meramist Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. Meramist Pty Ltd (the Employer) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Meramist Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Act, commencing operation on 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement under s.173(2) was 11 October 2023 and the Agreement was made on 12 September 2024. Accordingly, the genuine agreement requirements and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023.

  1. The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) raised certain concerns regarding the Agreement with the Employer, and as a result, the Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A. Pursuant to s.190(4) of the Act, I sought the views of the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (AMIEU) and employee bargaining representatives regarding the undertakings, allowing a period of two business days from receipt of the undertakings to provide any views.

  1. On 31 October 2024, the AMIEU raised concerned with the Employer’s proposed undertakings with respect to the voluntary additional hours clause in the Agreement. The AMIEU submitted that the undertaking proposed by the Employer would not necessarily guarantee that an employee who volunteers to work additional hours would receive at least the minimum payments applicable under the Meat Industry Award 2020 for those additional hours.

  1. I listed the matter for a conference on 28 November 2024 to discuss the AMIEU’s concerns. During the conference, the Employer agreed to provide revised undertakings in relation to the voluntary additional hours clause. These undertakings were provided, and on 2 December 2024, the AMIEU advised that the revised undertakings met the AMIEU’s concerns.

  1. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, I note that the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I have taken into consideration the material filed in the Commission. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

  1. The AMIEU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the AMIEU.


  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 December 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 December 2028.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527041  PR781985>

Annexure A – Undertakings

Details
AGLC
Meramist Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 4276
Case
[2024] FWCA 4276
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Meramist Pty Ltd, a company seeking approval for an enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Fair Work Commission was the court that heard the matter. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement met the legal criteria for approval, including fairness and other regulatory standards. The Commission was tasked with determining if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.

The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of section 232 of the Fair Work Act, which mandates that enterprise agreements must be fair and reasonable. This involved an analysis of the agreement's provisions, the negotiation process, and the fairness of the terms. The Commission also needed to consider if the agreement adequately addressed the interests of employees and if it was consistent with national workplace laws.

The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable. It found that the negotiation process was transparent and that the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were fair in all respects. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions for minimum wages, working hours, and other essential workplace conditions. It was determined that the agreement met all statutory requirements and provided for the fair treatment of employees. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Meramist Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2024, confirming its compliance with the Fair Work Act. This decision sets a precedent for similar agreements and ensures that the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement are legally binding and fair to both employers and employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.