DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Mental Health Association of Central Australia Inc
(AG2014/10297)

MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL AUSTRALIA (MHACA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Northern Territory
COMMISSIONER WILSON	MELBOURNE, 3 MARCH 2015

Application for approval of the Mental Health Association of Central Australia (MHACA) Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mental Health Association of Central Australia (MHACA) Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Mental Health Association of Central Australia Inc. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 March 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Central Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid (CAALA) and the Mental Health Association of Central Australia (MHACA) were the parties involved in the dispute. The application for approval of the MHACA Enterprise Agreement 2014 was brought before the Fair Work Commission. The agreement was challenged by CAALA, which raised concerns about certain provisions within the agreement. These concerns included the definition of the term 'employee' and the implications of these definitions on the scope of the agreement.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether the definitions in the agreement were valid and if they appropriately covered all employees within the organisation. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether the provisions were fair and reasonable. The Commission also needed to assess whether the agreement provided for appropriate industrial outcomes for both employees and the employer.

The Fair Work Commission found that the definitions in the MHACA Enterprise Agreement 2014 were valid and appropriately covered all employees within the organisation. The Commission held that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided for appropriate industrial outcomes for both employees and the employer. The Commission approved the agreement, finding that it met the necessary standards and provided for fair and reasonable outcomes for both parties.

Mental Health Association of Central Australia Inc

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established