Melbourne Market Authority Summary

[2014] FWCA 7109

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Melbourne Market Authority
(AG2014/7360)

MELBOURNE MARKET AUTHORITY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2015

State and Territory government administration
COMMISSIONER WILSON	MELBOURNE, 10 OCTOBER 2014

Application for approval of the Melbourne Market Authority Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Melbourne Market Authority Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Melbourne Market Authority (the Applicant).

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[3] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (the Union), being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the Union.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the Melbourne Market Authority sought approval of its Enterprise Agreement for the years 2013 to 2015. The matter was contested by the Retail and Fast Food Workers Union who objected to certain terms within the agreement. The dispute primarily centred around the classification of employees and the wage provisions outlined in the proposed agreement.

The legal issues before the Commission involved the interpretation of the Fair Work Act and the determination of whether the proposed agreement was consistent with the principles of the Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the classification of workers and the wage rates proposed in the agreement were fair and reasonable. The Union argued that the classification of certain employees as lower-paid casual workers was not justified and that the wage increases were inadequate.

The Fair Work Commission, after thorough consideration, found that the classification of workers in the proposed agreement was justified, given the nature of the work and the flexibility required by the Melbourne Market Authority. The Commission also found that the wage rates and conditions provided for in the agreement were fair and reasonable. The Union's objections were not upheld, and the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement.

The Commission's decision to approve the Enterprise Agreement was based on the evidence presented and the application of the Fair Work Act. The final orders included the approval of the Melbourne Market Authority Enterprise Agreement 2013 to 2015, with the terms and conditions as proposed by the Authority.

Melbourne Market Authority

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established