Mei Zhang v Ye Cheng
Case
•
[2018] NSWCA 299
•07 December 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mei Zhang v Ye Cheng [2018] NSWCA 299
[2018] NSWCA 299
07 December 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Mei Zhang (the applicant) sought leave to appeal from an interlocutory decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales that set aside a default judgment previously entered against Ye Cheng (the respondent). The application for leave to appeal was heard by McColl JA and Sackville AJA in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the application for leave to appeal raised an issue of principle, and whether any significant injustice would be caused to the applicant by refusing leave to appeal. These considerations are central to the determination of whether leave to appeal should be granted from an interlocutory decision.
The Court of Appeal considered the criteria for granting leave to appeal from an interlocutory decision, which requires demonstrating an issue of principle or a significant injustice. After reviewing the circumstances and the arguments presented, their Honours concluded that neither of these criteria had been met. Consequently, the Court of Appeal decided to dismiss the application for leave to appeal.
The Court ordered that the time for filing the summons seeking leave to appeal be extended until 16 August 2018, but ultimately dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The applicant was also ordered to pay the respondent’s costs of the application for leave to appeal.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the application for leave to appeal raised an issue of principle, and whether any significant injustice would be caused to the applicant by refusing leave to appeal. These considerations are central to the determination of whether leave to appeal should be granted from an interlocutory decision.
The Court of Appeal considered the criteria for granting leave to appeal from an interlocutory decision, which requires demonstrating an issue of principle or a significant injustice. After reviewing the circumstances and the arguments presented, their Honours concluded that neither of these criteria had been met. Consequently, the Court of Appeal decided to dismiss the application for leave to appeal.
The Court ordered that the time for filing the summons seeking leave to appeal be extended until 16 August 2018, but ultimately dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The applicant was also ordered to pay the respondent’s costs of the application for leave to appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Mei Zhang v Ye Cheng [2018] NSWCA 299
Most Recent Citation
Renwick Street Pty Limited v Parker [2020] NSWDC 552
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Kumar v Primes
[2024] NSWCA 134
Ritossa v Ritossa
[2023] NSWCA 14
Mitchell v Transport for NSW
[2022] NSWCA 141
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
3
Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc
[1981] HCA 39
Young v Cooke
[2017] NSWCA 33
Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc
[1981] HCA 39