[2013] FWCA 6249 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Meales Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2469)
MEALES CONCRETE PUMPING WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 30 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Meales Concrete Pumping Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Meales Concrete Pumping Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172 (2) (b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403513 PR540886>
- AGLC
- Meales Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6249
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6249
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Meales Concrete Pumping Wheatstone Project Agreement 2013 was indeed a greenfields agreement, as it involved new construction and there were no existing industrial relations arrangements at the project site. The court was satisfied that the application was properly made and that there were no procedural errors. The court approved the application for the agreement to be certified as a greenfields agreement, enabling the project to proceed with the specified industrial arrangements. The decision provided clarity on the criteria for a greenfields agreement and the procedural requirements for such applications under the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.