[2013] FWCA 256 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
MDM Electrical Services Pty Ltd
(AG2012/14449)
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER BULL | SYDNEY, 15 JANUARY 2013 |
Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty.
[1] An application pursuant to s.217 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) has been made by MDM Electrical Services Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for approval of a variation to the MDM Electrical Services Pty Ltd & ETU Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement).
[2] Submissions in support of the variation have been received from the Applicant, those submissions are supported by the Electrical Trades Union of Australia (NSW Branch), which is covered by the Agreement.
[3] The Agreement is varied as followed:
1. Delete the Table in Schedule B – Rates of Pay of the Agreement.
2. Insert the following Table in Schedule B – Rates of Pay of the Agreement.
Classification | Upon Lodgement | 1/7/13 | 1/7/14 | 1/7/15 |
Grade 2 | 26.00 | 27.04 | 28.12 | 29.24 |
Grade 3 | 27.04 | 28.12 | 29.24 | 30.40 |
Grade 4 | 28.12 | 29.24 | 30.40 | 31.60 |
Grade 5 Unlicensed | 29.24 | 30.40 | 31.60 | 32.80 |
Grade 5 Licensed | 33.16 | 34.48 | 35.85 | 37.28 |
Grade 6 | 34.48 | 35.85 | 37.28 | 38.77 |
Grade 7 | 35.85 | 37.28 | 38.77 | 40.32 |
Grade 8 | 37.28 | 38.77 | 40.32 | 41.93 |
Apprentices | ||||
1st 6 months | 12.57 | 13.07 | 13.59 | 14.14 |
2nd 6 months | 13.20 | 13.73 | 14.28 | 14.85 |
Indentured 2nd year | 16.06 | 16.70 | 17.37 | 18.07 |
Indentured 3rd year | 21.71 | 22.58 | 23.48 | 24.42 |
Indentured 4th year | 25.33 | 26.34 | 27.39 | 28.49 |
Mature Apprentices | ||||
Indentured 1st year | 24.87 | 25.86 | 26.89 | 27.90 |
Indentured 2nd year | 26.50 | 27.56 | 28.66 | 29.80 |
Indentured 3rd year | 27.80 | 28.90 | 30.06 | 31.27 |
Indentured 4th year | 29.84 | 31.03 | 32.27 | 33.56 |
[4] The Agreement is varied and, in accordance with s.217(2) of the Act, will operate from 15 January 2013. A consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied is attached.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE897739 PR533122 >
- AGLC
- MDM Electrical Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 256
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 256
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously examined the nature of the agreement and the alleged ambiguity. It was noted that the primary purpose of the variation was to clarify terms that had led to misunderstandings between the parties. The court considered whether the proposed variation was reasonable and necessary for achieving the agreement's objectives. It assessed the parties' intentions and the context in which the agreement was made.
After thorough deliberation, the court determined that the proposed variation was reasonable and necessary to eliminate the ambiguity. The court held that the variation would result in an agreement that more accurately reflected the parties' intentions, thereby enhancing clarity and enforceability. Consequently, the court granted the application to vary the agreement. The final orders reflected the court's decision, allowing the parties to proceed with the amended terms of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.