| [2024] FWCA 1503 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
McYess & Pinnacle College T/A McYess and Burc College
(AG2024/1119)
PINNACLE COLLEGE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Educational services | |
| COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 23 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the Pinnacle College Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pinnacle College Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by McYess & Pinnacle College T/A McYess and Burc College (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 15 April 2024.
In respect of the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) deficiency it appears a pre-reform version of the NERR was provided to employees. I am satisfied taking into consideration s.188(5) of the Act, that the procedural or technical error is minor and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged, and accordingly, that there has been a genuine agreement.
The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 31 October 2026.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524375 PR773846>
- AGLC
- McYess & Pinnacle College T/A McYess and Burc College [2024] FWCA 1503
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1503
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved assessing the fairness of the agreement’s provisions, particularly concerning pay rates, classification of employees, working conditions, and other employment terms. It was essential to ensure that the agreement did not disadvantage employees unduly and complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to evaluate whether the agreement provided a safety net of minimum entitlements and allowed for genuine flexibility in the workplace.
In its reasoning, the Commission carefully examined each clause of the agreement, considering input from both parties and relevant legislative standards. The Commission noted that the agreement, while comprehensive, required some amendments to better align with the statutory requirements. The Commission identified specific areas of concern, particularly regarding the classification of roles and remuneration. After negotiations and adjustments, the Commission concluded that the agreement, with the proposed changes, was fair and reasonable. The final order was that the agreement be approved with the specified modifications to address the identified issues.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.