McLoughlin v Randstad Pty Ltd

In *McLoughlin v Randstad Pty Ltd*, heard before Judge Street, the applicant sought to strike out paragraph 68 of the respondent's amended response. The precise nature of the dispute, beyond the application to strike out, is not detailed in the provided text.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the content of paragraph 68 of the amended response was an appropriate pleading and should therefore be permitted to stand, or if it should be struck out.

Judge Street determined that the underlying content of paragraph 68 of the amended response was not appropriate for pleading and ordered that it be struck out. No further reasoning or legal principles applied are disclosed in the provided text.