MCKENZIE & MCKENZIE

The parties to this proceeding were McKenzie & McKenzie, the applicants, and the respondent, whose identity is not specified in the provided text. The dispute concerned an application for an order for possession of a property. The matter came before Cassidy J.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicants were entitled to an order for possession of the property. This required the court to consider the legal basis for the applicants' claim to possession and any defences or counterarguments that might be raised by the respondent.

Cassidy J considered the evidence presented and the relevant legal principles governing possession of property. The judgment indicates that the court found in favour of the applicants, granting the order for possession. The specific legal reasoning and the precise grounds upon which the order was made are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome clearly indicates a successful claim by McKenzie & McKenzie.