McKensey v Hewitt
Case
•
[1999] NSWCA 426
•3 December 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McKensey v Hewitt [1999] NSWCA 426
[1999] NSWCA 426
3 December 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal in *McKensey v Hewitt* concerned a dispute between partners. The primary issue was whether one partner, Mr. Hewitt, had breached his fiduciary duties to the other partner, Mr. McKensey, by failing to disclose certain information and acting in bad faith. The case was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether Mr. Hewitt had breached his duty of good faith and disclosure to Mr. McKensey, and whether this constituted a breach of fiduciary duty. The court also had to consider the appropriate orders to be made in light of its findings.
The Court of Appeal found that the evidence did not support a finding that Mr. Hewitt had breached his fiduciary duty to Mr. McKensey. The court reasoned that the duty of good faith and disclosure owed between partners did not extend to requiring disclosure of information that was not relevant to the partnership's business or that was already in the public domain. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside certain declarations and orders made by the primary judge concerning the alleged breaches. The court also made specific orders regarding the costs of the second cross-claim and made no order as to the costs of the appeal.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether Mr. Hewitt had breached his duty of good faith and disclosure to Mr. McKensey, and whether this constituted a breach of fiduciary duty. The court also had to consider the appropriate orders to be made in light of its findings.
The Court of Appeal found that the evidence did not support a finding that Mr. Hewitt had breached his fiduciary duty to Mr. McKensey. The court reasoned that the duty of good faith and disclosure owed between partners did not extend to requiring disclosure of information that was not relevant to the partnership's business or that was already in the public domain. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside certain declarations and orders made by the primary judge concerning the alleged breaches. The court also made specific orders regarding the costs of the second cross-claim and made no order as to the costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Breach
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
McKensey v Hewitt [1999] NSWCA 426
Most Recent Citation
Page v Mckensey [2004] NSWCA 437
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Westfield Management Limited v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
[2007] HCATrans 367
Currie v Glen
[1936] HCA 1