McGuirk v University of New South Wales; University of New South Wales v McGuirk
Case
•
[2009] NSWCA 321
•7 October 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McGuirk v University of New South Wales; University of New South Wales v McGuirk [2009] NSWCA 321
[2009] NSWCA 321
7 October 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The New South Wales Court of Appeal considered appeals by the University of New South Wales and Mr. McGuirk concerning a decision of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal (ADT) regarding access to a document under the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW). Mr. McGuirk sought access to a document that the University claimed was exempt due to legal professional privilege. The ADT had previously allowed Mr. McGuirk access to the document, a decision that was then appealed to the Supreme Court, which remitted the matter back to the ADT for further determination.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the ADT possessed the power to grant access to a document that was otherwise exempt under the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW) by virtue of legal professional privilege, and whether the University had waived that privilege by providing the document to a third party with the approval of the Chancellor. The Court also considered whether an appeal lay from the primary judge's reasons, rather than the orders made, and whether the ADT had erred in failing to remit the matter to the ADT on a specific ground.
The Court of Appeal reasoned that the ADT's powers were limited to those conferred by statute, and that s 63(2) of the *Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1987* did not grant the ADT the power to override the statutory exemption for documents subject to legal professional privilege under the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW). The Court found that the ADT had erred in its previous determination by exercising a power it did not possess. Regarding the waiver of privilege, the Court held that the provision of the document to a third party with the Chancellor's approval did not, in the circumstances, constitute a waiver of legal professional privilege.
The Court of Appeal allowed the University's appeal, setting aside the orders of the ADT's Appeal Panel. It declared that the ADT had no power under s 63(2) of the *Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1987* to grant access to a document that was exempt by virtue of Schedule 1, cl 10 of the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW). No order was made as to the costs of the appeal.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the ADT possessed the power to grant access to a document that was otherwise exempt under the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW) by virtue of legal professional privilege, and whether the University had waived that privilege by providing the document to a third party with the approval of the Chancellor. The Court also considered whether an appeal lay from the primary judge's reasons, rather than the orders made, and whether the ADT had erred in failing to remit the matter to the ADT on a specific ground.
The Court of Appeal reasoned that the ADT's powers were limited to those conferred by statute, and that s 63(2) of the *Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1987* did not grant the ADT the power to override the statutory exemption for documents subject to legal professional privilege under the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW). The Court found that the ADT had erred in its previous determination by exercising a power it did not possess. Regarding the waiver of privilege, the Court held that the provision of the document to a third party with the Chancellor's approval did not, in the circumstances, constitute a waiver of legal professional privilege.
The Court of Appeal allowed the University's appeal, setting aside the orders of the ADT's Appeal Panel. It declared that the ADT had no power under s 63(2) of the *Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1987* to grant access to a document that was exempt by virtue of Schedule 1, cl 10 of the *Freedom of Information Act 1989* (NSW). No order was made as to the costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Privilege
-
Statutory Construction
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
McGuirk v University of New South Wales; University of New South Wales v McGuirk [2009] NSWCA 321
Most Recent Citation
Pages Hire Centre (NSW) Pty Ltd and Boros v Department of Premier and Cabinet [2014] SADC 3
Cases Citing This Decision
48
Marium v Darley
[2025] NSWCA 198
Hellenic Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Makaritis
[2025] NSWCA 13
Hellenic Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Makaritis
[2025] NSWCA 13
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
9
University of New South Wales v McGuirk (No 2)
[2008] NSWADTAP 8
McGuirk v University of New South Wales
[2005] NSWADT 289
University of New South Wales v McGuirk
[2006] NSWADTAP 38