McDermott v McDermott (No 2)

Case

[2023] QSC 263

20 November 2023


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
McDermott v McDermott (No 2) [2023] QSC 263 [2023] QSC 263 20 November 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of McDermott v McDermott (No 2) involved a dispute between the applicant and the respondents over the adequacy of the provision for the applicant's maintenance and support under his late father's Will and Codicil. The proceedings were dismissed, and the respondents sought their costs on the standard basis until 30 September 2021 and thereafter on the indemnity basis, to be paid from the assets left by the Will to the trustees of the Christopher Martin McDermott Testamentary Trust (CMMTT). On 16 September 2021, the respondents made an offer to settle to the applicant. The central legal issue before the court was whether the respondents were entitled to the indemnity costs from the assets left by the Will to the trustees of the CMMTT.

The court considered the relevant considerations for indemnity costs, which include whether the applicant's claim was frivolous or vexatious, whether the applicant had acted unreasonably in bringing or continuing the proceedings, and whether there were any other factors that warranted indemnity costs. The court noted that the applicant had not succeeded in his claim and that the proceedings were dismissed. Additionally, the offer to settle made by the respondents on 16 September 2021 was not accepted by the applicant. The court found that the applicant's claim was not well-founded and that the applicant had acted unreasonably in bringing and continuing the proceedings.

Accordingly, the court ordered that the respondents were to be paid their costs on the standard basis until 30 September 2021 and thereafter on the indemnity basis from the assets left by the Will of William Terrence Chisholm McDermott to the trustees of the CMMTT. The court concluded that the respondents were entitled to the indemnity costs as the applicant's claim was not well-founded, and the applicant had acted unreasonably in bringing and continuing the proceedings. The court's decision was based on the specific circumstances of the case and the relevant considerations for indemnity costs.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Indemnity Costs

  • Standing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

Cases Cited

12

Statutory Material Cited

1

McDermott v McDermott [2023] QSC 163
Jvancich v Kennedy (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 397
Draper v Nixon [1999] NSWSC 629