[2013] FWCA 7464 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2821)
MCCONNELL DOWELL CONSTRUCTORS (AUST) PTY LTD ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 2 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement states that the enterprise is a genuine new enterprise that the employer is proposing to establish. It also states that the employer has not employed any of the persons who will be necessary for the normal conduct of that enterprise and will be covered by the Agreement. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of s.172 (2) (b) have been met and as a consequence the Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is three and a half years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404378 PR542514>
- AGLC
- McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7464
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7464
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The FWC undertook a comprehensive review of the proposed agreement, assessing its provisions against the statutory criteria. This included evaluating the financial implications for employees, the balance of rights and obligations, and whether the agreement provided genuine protections and benefits. The FWC also considered submissions from both parties and expert evidence presented on the economic and operational context of the Roy Hill project. The applicant argued that the agreement was necessary for the project's successful completion, while the union contended that it did not adequately protect employee interests.
After careful deliberation, the FWC found that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirement of being better off overall for the employees. The Commission identified several shortcomings, including inadequate provisions for employee entitlements and insufficient mechanisms for addressing workplace issues. Consequently, the FWC rejected the application for approval, emphasising the importance of ensuring that any industrial agreement genuinely benefits the workforce. The FWC's decision underscored the need for comprehensive scrutiny of industrial agreements to safeguard employee rights and interests.
No orders were made as the application for approval was dismissed. The FWC's decision highlighted the importance of thorough evaluation in the approval process for industrial agreements, ensuring they genuinely benefit the employees they cover.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.