McCarthy v National Australia Bank Ltd
Case
•
[2015] NSWCA 32
•24 February 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McCarthy v National Australia Bank Ltd [2015] NSWCA 32
[2015] NSWCA 32
24 February 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *McCarthy v National Australia Bank Ltd*, the applicant, Warren McCarthy, sought an interim stay of a writ of possession. This application was made in the context of seeking leave to appeal a judge's refusal to set aside a default judgment previously entered in favour of National Australia Bank Ltd. The core of Mr. McCarthy's application was whether the evidence he proposed to rely upon was sufficiently supportive of the grounds of his intended defence to warrant setting aside the default judgment.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant an interim stay of the default judgment and associated orders, and whether to grant leave to the applicant to serve a subpoena on the respondent bank. This was to facilitate the presentation of his application for leave to appeal in a timely manner, particularly in relation to the evidence he sought to obtain from the bank to support his proposed defence.
Basten JA granted an interim stay of the default judgment and orders until 9am on Monday, 16 March 2015. The court also granted leave to the applicant to issue and serve a subpoena on the respondent bank by 5pm on Monday, 2 March 2015, for the production of documents. This subpoena was to be returnable on 16 March 2015, with the bank afforded leave to raise any objections to the subpoena, which the court would consider on that date. The costs of the present motion were reserved to be costs in the motion.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant an interim stay of the default judgment and associated orders, and whether to grant leave to the applicant to serve a subpoena on the respondent bank. This was to facilitate the presentation of his application for leave to appeal in a timely manner, particularly in relation to the evidence he sought to obtain from the bank to support his proposed defence.
Basten JA granted an interim stay of the default judgment and orders until 9am on Monday, 16 March 2015. The court also granted leave to the applicant to issue and serve a subpoena on the respondent bank by 5pm on Monday, 2 March 2015, for the production of documents. This subpoena was to be returnable on 16 March 2015, with the bank afforded leave to raise any objections to the subpoena, which the court would consider on that date. The costs of the present motion were reserved to be costs in the motion.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Discovery
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
McCarthy v National Australia Bank [2020] NSWSC 1355
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Habkouk
[2022] NSWSC 98
McCarthy v National Australia Bank
[2020] NSWSC 1355
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
National Australia Bank Limited v McCarthy
[2014] NSWSC 1819