Mazukov v University of Tasmania
Case
•
[2000] FCA 1091
•4 AUGUST 2000
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mazukov v University of Tasmania [2000] FCA 1091
[2000] FCA 1091
4 AUGUST 2000
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Mr. Mazukov, brought an application against the University of Tasmania seeking to extend the time within which he could bring his application. The application was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. Mr. Mazukov sought an extension of time to bring his application for judicial review of a decision by the University to terminate his employment.
The legal issues before the court were whether Mr. Mazukov had a sufficient basis to support an extension of time to bring his application and whether he had demonstrated any special or extraordinary circumstances which might warrant such an extension. The court noted that Mr. Mazukov had failed to provide any explanation for the delay in bringing his application and had not demonstrated any special or extraordinary circumstances that might warrant an extension of time.
The court held that there was no sufficient basis for Mr. Mazukov to be granted leave for an extension of time within which to bring his application. The court noted that Mr. Mazukov had failed to provide any explanation for the delay in bringing his application and had not demonstrated any special or extraordinary circumstances that might warrant an extension of time. The court also held that the applicant must pay the respondent's costs.
The legal issues before the court were whether Mr. Mazukov had a sufficient basis to support an extension of time to bring his application and whether he had demonstrated any special or extraordinary circumstances which might warrant such an extension. The court noted that Mr. Mazukov had failed to provide any explanation for the delay in bringing his application and had not demonstrated any special or extraordinary circumstances that might warrant an extension of time.
The court held that there was no sufficient basis for Mr. Mazukov to be granted leave for an extension of time within which to bring his application. The court noted that Mr. Mazukov had failed to provide any explanation for the delay in bringing his application and had not demonstrated any special or extraordinary circumstances that might warrant an extension of time. The court also held that the applicant must pay the respondent's costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Mazukov v University of Tasmania [2003] FCA 253
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Mazukov v University of Tasmania
[2003] FCA 253
Low v Commonwealth
[2001] FCA 702
Mazukov v University of Tasmania
[2003] FCA 253
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Griffith University v Tang
[2005] HCA 7
Griffith University v Tang
[2005] HCA 7
Griffith University v Tang
[2005] HCA 7