Matthews & Norris (No. 3)
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 803
•5 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Matthews & Norris (No 3) [2018] FamCA 803
[2018] FamCA 803
5 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Matthews & Norris (No. 3)*, Cleary J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application filed by the husband and a response filed by the wife. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved proceedings initiated by both the husband and the wife.
The court was required to determine whether to grant the application filed by the husband and the response filed by the wife. The specific legal questions before the court would have related to the merits of each party's claims or requests within the broader family law proceedings.
Cleary J dismissed both the husband's application and the wife's response. No orders were made as to costs.
The court was required to determine whether to grant the application filed by the husband and the response filed by the wife. The specific legal questions before the court would have related to the merits of each party's claims or requests within the broader family law proceedings.
Cleary J dismissed both the husband's application and the wife's response. No orders were made as to costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
MATTHEWS & NORRIS [2020] FamCA 547
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Pencious & Searle
[2017] FamCAFC 210
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2)
[2009] FCA 398