Mathews v Foggitt Jones Ltd
Case
•
[1926] HCA 13
•27 May 1926
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mathews v Foggitt Jones Ltd [1926] HCA 13
[1926] HCA 13
27 May 1926
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, Mathews, was charged with an offence under section 19 of the *Newcastle District Abattoir and Sale-yards Act 1912* (N.S.W.) for bringing a portion of a carcase into a prohibited area. The respondent, Foggitt Jones Ltd, was the prosecutor. The case was heard by the High Court of Australia, comprising Knox CJ, Isaacs and Gavan Duffy JJ.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether sausages, which were the subject of the charge, constituted a "carcase or any portion of carcase" within the meaning of section 19 of the Act.
The Court considered the definition of "carcase" and the process by which sausages are made. It was held that sausages, being manufactured products derived from meat but not in their original form, were not a "carcase or any portion of carcase" as contemplated by the legislation. The Act was intended to regulate the movement of raw meat and animal products in their natural state, not processed goods.
The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction was set aside.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether sausages, which were the subject of the charge, constituted a "carcase or any portion of carcase" within the meaning of section 19 of the Act.
The Court considered the definition of "carcase" and the process by which sausages are made. It was held that sausages, being manufactured products derived from meat but not in their original form, were not a "carcase or any portion of carcase" as contemplated by the legislation. The Act was intended to regulate the movement of raw meat and animal products in their natural state, not processed goods.
The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction was set aside.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
-
Charge
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Kingsbrook SA P/L v Alexandrina Council [2020] SADC 39
Cases Citing This Decision
27
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kumar
[2017] HCA 11
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kumar
[2017] HCA 11
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kumar
[2017] HCA 11
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
Cited Sections