[2016] FWCA 1070
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Glass & Glazing Association Victoria Inc |
| (AG2015/7241) |
MASTERGLASS & ALUMINIUM ENTERPRISE BARGAINING
AGREEMENT 2015-2019
Manufacturing and associated industries
| COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 18 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the MasterGlass & Aluminium Enterprise Bargaining Agreement
2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
MasterGlass & Aluminium Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement).
The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been
made by the Glass & Glazing Association Victoria Inc. The Agreement is a single enterprise
agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is
attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment
to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in
substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the
requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have
been met.
[2016] FWCA 1070
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from
25 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 February 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Price code G, AE417882 PR577167
[2016] FWCA 1070
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Masterglass and Aluminium Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1070
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1070
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commissioner considered the provisions of the Fair Work Act and the undertakings provided by the applicant. The Commissioner found that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval and that the undertakings would not cause financial detriment to employees or result in substantial changes to the agreement. The Commissioner was satisfied that the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it met the necessary criteria for approval. The court also noted that the nominal expiry date of the agreement was 17 February 2020.
In light of the above, the Commissioner approved the agreement and ordered that it would operate from 25 February 2016. The court considered that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it met the necessary criteria for approval. The court also noted that the applicant had provided written undertakings that would not cause financial detriment to employees or result in substantial changes to the agreement. The court was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and the employer, and that it would promote harmonious, productive and cooperative workplace relations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.