Martin v State of New South Wales
Case
•
[2011] NSWLEC 20
•24 February 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Martin v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWLEC 20
[2011] NSWLEC 20
24 February 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In Martin v State of New South Wales, the plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered as a result of the negligence of the defendant, the State of New South Wales. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, with the Honourable Justice Brereton presiding. The plaintiff's claims included damages for pain and suffering, loss of amenities of life, and loss of earning capacity.
The court was required to consider whether the plaintiff's claims were justiciable, given the limitation periods that applied to actions against the Crown, and whether the plaintiff had standing to bring the claim. The court also needed to determine whether the plaintiff had provided sufficient particulars to support the claims made, and whether the plaintiff was able to satisfy the requirement of providing security for the defendant's costs.
Justice Brereton found that the plaintiff's claims were not justiciable due to the limitation periods that applied to actions against the Crown. The court also found that the plaintiff had not provided sufficient particulars to support the claims made, and that the plaintiff was not able to satisfy the requirement of providing security for the defendant's costs. Accordingly, the court struck out the plaintiff's Points of Claim, required the plaintiff to provide security for costs, and stayed the proceedings until such time as the security was provided. If the security was not provided within two months, the proceedings would be dismissed. If the security was provided, the plaintiff could apply for leave to file amended Points of Claim, provided that they were accompanied by affidavits identifying facts that supported the claims made and demonstrated the plaintiff's standing to bring the claim. Costs were reserved.
The court was required to consider whether the plaintiff's claims were justiciable, given the limitation periods that applied to actions against the Crown, and whether the plaintiff had standing to bring the claim. The court also needed to determine whether the plaintiff had provided sufficient particulars to support the claims made, and whether the plaintiff was able to satisfy the requirement of providing security for the defendant's costs.
Justice Brereton found that the plaintiff's claims were not justiciable due to the limitation periods that applied to actions against the Crown. The court also found that the plaintiff had not provided sufficient particulars to support the claims made, and that the plaintiff was not able to satisfy the requirement of providing security for the defendant's costs. Accordingly, the court struck out the plaintiff's Points of Claim, required the plaintiff to provide security for costs, and stayed the proceedings until such time as the security was provided. If the security was not provided within two months, the proceedings would be dismissed. If the security was provided, the plaintiff could apply for leave to file amended Points of Claim, provided that they were accompanied by affidavits identifying facts that supported the claims made and demonstrated the plaintiff's standing to bring the claim. Costs were reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Security for Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Dismissal
-
Affidavits
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Attorney General of New South Wales v Martin [2015] NSWSC 1372
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Martin v State of New South Wales
[2014] NSWCA 103
Martin v State of New South Wales (No 14)
[2012] NSWCA 46
Martin v State of New South Wales (No 13)
[2011] NSWCA 296
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
4
Leerdam v Noori
[2009] NSWCA 90
Leerdam v Noori
[2009] NSWCA 90
Midcoast Lime Co Pty Ltd v Minister for Primary Industries
[2008] NSWSC 331