MARSHMAN & MARSHMAN

Case

[2015] FCCA 2794

20 November 2015


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Marshman and Marshman [2015] FCCA 2794 [2015] FCCA 2794 20 November 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Marshman & Marshman*, Judge Altobelli of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered a dispute between the parties. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but the court's reasons for judgment indicate it involved matters requiring the court's determination and subsequent orders.

The central legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate orders to be made in light of the parties' circumstances, as reflected in the reasons for judgment. This involved the court's power to make binding orders that would implement its findings and resolve the matters in dispute between the parties.

Judge Altobelli's reasoning, as evidenced by the orders made, focused on facilitating a final resolution. The court directed the parties to collaborate and submit an agreed Minute of Order within 21 days, demonstrating a preference for consent and mutual agreement. Should agreement prove impossible, the court provided a mechanism for each party to submit their own proposed Minute of Order within 28 days, allowing the court to make a final determination based on these submissions.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

2

Bevan & Bevan [2013] FamCAFC 116
Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
Williams & Williams [2007] FamCA 313