| [2023] FWC 203 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Mark Workman
v
Ramsay Health Care Aust PL
(U2022/12277)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 24 JANUARY 2023 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy
On 24 December 2022 Mr Mark Workman made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
The application was incomplete in that Mr Workman did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.
On 4 January 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Workman’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that, if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received within 14 days, the application may be dismissed.
On 5 January 2023 the Commission attempted to contact Mr Workman on his nominated telephone number to discuss payment of the required fee however, the call was not answered. A voicemail message was left requesting that Mr Workman contact the Commission to discuss the matter further and pay the fee.
A final attempt to contact Mr Workman was made by the Commission on 17 January 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered, and a voicemail message was left advising Mr Workman that payment of the required fee was still outstanding.
To date Mr Workman has not paid the required fee or completed a waiver form.
Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR749925>
- AGLC
- Mark Workman v Ramsay Health Care Aust PL [2023] FWC 203
- Case
- [2023] FWC 203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Commission was whether the application met the procedural requirements under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court had to determine if the application could proceed despite the absence of the required fee or waiver form. Section 395 of the FW Act mandates that an application to the FWC must be accompanied by a prescribed fee, and section 587(1)(a) allows for the dismissal of an application if it is not made in accordance with the Act.
The Commission found that the application did not comply with the Act due to the missing fee. Consequently, the application was dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act. The Commission determined that the procedural non-compliance was a valid ground for dismissing the application. The applicant's failure to address the fee requirement despite multiple notifications rendered the application non-compliant.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.