| [2021] FWCA 90 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mark Moran at Little Bay Pty Ltd
(AG2020/4056)
MARK MORAN AT LITTLE BAY PTY LIMITED AND NSWNMA/ANMF NSW BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT, 2020 TO 2023
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI | MELBOURNE, 8 JANUARY 2021 |
Application for approval of the Mark Moran at Little Bay Pty Limited and NSWNMA/ANMF NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement, 2020 to 2023.
[1] Mark Moran at Little Bay Pty Ltd has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Mark Moran at Little Bay Pty Limited and NSWNMA/ANMF NSW Branch Enterprise Agreement, 2020 to 2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and related materials, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 8 January 2021 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 15 January 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE510052 PR726063>
- AGLC
- Mark Moran at Little Bay Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 90
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 90
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved the fairness and compliance of the agreement with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test' and was free from any unfair provisions. This included assessing if the proposed terms and conditions were consistent with the relevant industrial instruments and did not undermine the employees' rights or entitlements.
The Commission, after reviewing the submissions and evidence presented, found that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the 'better off overall test'. It concluded that the agreement was fair and did not contain any provisions that would be considered unfair under the Act. The Commission highlighted that the agreement provided for adequate protections and benefits for the employees, ensuring that they were not disadvantaged by the terms proposed. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to the conditions outlined in the order.
The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement, with certain conditions such as the need for a formal dispute resolution process to be implemented. The agreement was to be in effect from the date of the decision and would bind both parties for the duration specified. The decision underscored the importance of ensuring that all parties involved in the agreement were fairly treated and that the terms reflected a balanced approach to the needs of both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.