Mark and Messina

Case

[2009] FamCA 1021

27 OCTOBER 2009


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Mark and Messina [2009] FamCA 1021 [2009] FamCA 1021 27 OCTOBER 2009

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Mark and Messina, Justice Cronin of the Family Court of Australia considered an application concerning the disclosure of documents. The dispute centred on whether certain memoranda, file notes, and correspondence between the wife's solicitors, Gibson and Gibson Lawyers, and the wife herself, relating to discussions about the wife's approach to her relationship with the father of a child, C, should be made available for inspection and copying.

The primary legal issue before the Court was the discoverability of these documents. Specifically, the Court had to determine if the documents sought were relevant to the proceedings and if any privilege, such as legal professional privilege, attached to them, thereby potentially exempting them from disclosure. The Court was tasked with balancing the need for full and frank disclosure in family law proceedings against the protection of confidential communications between a client and their legal representatives.

Justice Cronin ordered that Mr John Redman of Gibson and Gibson Lawyers make available for inspection and copying all memoranda, file notes, and correspondence between the firm and the wife concerning her discussions with the firm about the approach to be taken by the wife in relation to the relationship between C and the father. The Court also directed that any issues regarding costs arising from these proceedings be determined by written submissions, with specific deadlines set for the filing and service of these submissions and any replies. Furthermore, the Court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the proceedings, pursuant to Order 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Discovery

  • Costs

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

PASCOT & PASCOT [2010] FamCA 644
Hawkins and Hawkins [2014] FCCA 1071
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

2

Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66