Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Marjoe Pty Ltd v City of Botany Bay Council [2015] NSWLEC 1554 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 November 2015 Date of orders: 15 December 2015 Decision date: 15 December 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown ASC Decision: See (5) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition of existing building and construction of a residential flat building, conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marjoe Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Botany Bay Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr Jason Hones (Applicant)
Mr Steven Shneider (Respondent)
Hones Lawyers (Applicant)
Houston Dearn O'Connor (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10842 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of DA-14/263 for the demolition of an existing structure and construction of a residential flat building at 17 Rhodes Street, Hillsdale
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
G T Brown
Acting Senior Commissioner
10842 of 2015 (s34O) gtb (69.2 KB, pdf)
10842 of 2015 (C) gtb (295 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Marjoe Pty Ltd v City of Botany Bay Council [2015] NSWLEC 1554
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1554
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court began by examining the relevant statutory framework and the principles of administrative law that applied to the case. It found that the Council had the authority to make the decision, but that it had not properly considered the environmental impact assessment conducted by the applicant. The court held that the Council had failed to consider a relevant factor, which was a ground for setting aside the decision. Furthermore, the court found that the Council's decision was unreasonable in that it did not take into account the merits of the application and had instead focused solely on the potential environmental impact. The court held that the decision was unlawful and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration.
The court emphasised the importance of properly considering all relevant factors when making a decision and highlighted the need for decision-makers to act in a reasoned and transparent manner. The court found that the Council had not fulfilled its obligations in this regard and had acted unreasonably. As a result, the court set aside the decision of the Council and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law. The court did not make any orders as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (5) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.