| [2016] FWCA 854 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mario Verrocchi & East Yarra Friendly Society T/A My Chemist Health & Beauty Distribution
(AG2015/7215)
SOMERTON H & B DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | SYDNEY, 9 FEBRUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Somerton H & B Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Somerton H & B Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Mario Verrocchi & East Yarra Friendly Society T/A My Chemist Health & Beauty Distribution. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 9 February 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 16 February 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 February 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417761 PR576870>
- AGLC
- Mario Verrocchi & East Yarra Friendly Society T/A My Chemist Health & Beauty Distribution [2016] FWCA 854
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 854
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the enterprise agreement provided a fair safety net for employees and was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009. This required the court to consider the specifics of the agreement, including terms related to wages, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It also had to assess whether the agreement was procedurally sound, given that the union had withdrawn from the process.
In delivering the judgment, the court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the agreement offered a fair safety net and was consistent with the legislative framework. The court noted the absence of the union but concluded that the process followed was fair and that the agreement's provisions were reasonable in the circumstances. Consequently, the court approved the enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the court were that the Somerton Health & Beauty Distribution Enterprise Agreement 2015 be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision was effective from the date of the judgment and binding on all parties involved in the distribution enterprise.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.