Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Marchese v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWLEC 1310 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 June 2018 Date of orders: 21 June 2018 Decision date: 21 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See [5] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eugene Marchese (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Staunton (Applicant)
Dr J Smith (Respondent)
AJL Legal (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/282995 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal by Egene Marchese against the deemed refusal by Central Coast Council of development application no. 52565/2017 for construction of coastal protection works at 29, 31 & 33 Pacific Street and 23a, 23b & 25c Ocean View Drive, Wamberal.
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Consent is granted to development application 52565/2017, for the construction of coastal protection works at:
Lot 6 DP 8854, with a street address of 29 Pacific Street Wamberal
Lot 5 DP 8854, with a street address of 31 Pacific Street Wamberal
Lot 4 DP 8854, with a street address of 33 Pacific Street Wamberal
Lot 3 DP 8854, with a street address of 23a Ocean View Drive Wamberal
Lot 2 DP 8854, with a street address of 23b Ocean View Drive Wamberal
Lot 4 DP 524938, with a street address of 25c Ocean View Drive Wamberal
subject to the conditions contained in the annexure marked “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
Joanne Gray
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (314 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Marchese v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWLEC 1310
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1310
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key issues before the court were whether the council had acted outside its statutory powers, whether it had failed to comply with procedural fairness, and whether there had been any errors of law in the council's decision-making process. The plaintiff argued that the council had failed to consider all relevant factors, had not provided adequate reasons for its decision, and had acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner.
The court examined the statutory framework governing development applications and the principles of administrative law that apply to decision-making by local councils. It held that the council had not acted outside its statutory powers and had adequately considered the relevant factors. The court also found that the reasons provided by the council were sufficient and that there had been no procedural unfairness. Consequently, the court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and affirmed the council's decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [5] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.