[2014] FWCA 312 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mar’s Project Installations Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12021)
MAR’S PROJECT INSTALLATIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 13 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the MAR’s Project Installations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MAR’s Project Installations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Mar’s Project Installations Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 January 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 12 January 2018.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE406352 PR546747>
- AGLC
- Mar’s Project Installations Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 312
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 312
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if it adhered to the procedural requirements for employee consultation and the inclusion of specific mandatory terms. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the agreement contained terms that were unfair, in that they would undermine the protections provided by the National Employment Standards and the safety net of minimum terms and conditions provided by modern awards.
After reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. The agreement was deemed fair and reasonable, providing for adequate consultation processes and including all necessary mandatory terms. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement did not contain any terms that would undermine the protections of the National Employment Standards or the minimum terms of the relevant modern award. Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the 2013 Enterprise Agreement was approved in its entirety.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.