Mao v AMP Superannuation Fund
Case
•
[2015] NSWCA 178
•22 June 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mao v AMP Superannuation Fund [2015] NSWCA 178
[2015] NSWCA 178
22 June 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Mao v AMP Superannuation Fund*, the applicant sought leave to amend a notice of motion filed on 17 June 2015. The respondents were AMP Superannuation Fund. The matter came before Emmett JA.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the applicant leave to amend her notice of motion. A related issue was the ultimate disposition of the notice of motion itself.
Emmett JA refused leave to amend the notice of motion. Consequently, the notice of motion filed on 17 June 2015 was dismissed. The applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondents in relation to that motion. The court also issued directions regarding the filing of written submissions and a schedule of additional documents for a hearing scheduled for 13 July 2015.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the applicant leave to amend her notice of motion. A related issue was the ultimate disposition of the notice of motion itself.
Emmett JA refused leave to amend the notice of motion. Consequently, the notice of motion filed on 17 June 2015 was dismissed. The applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondents in relation to that motion. The court also issued directions regarding the filing of written submissions and a schedule of additional documents for a hearing scheduled for 13 July 2015.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
High Court Bulletin [2015] HCAB 9
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Mao v AMP Superannuation Ltd
[2015] NSWCA 252
Mao v AMP Superannuation Limited
[2017] NSWSC 987
High Court Bulletin
[2015] HCAB 9
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2