MANSKY & MARCO

The parties to this proceeding were Mansky & Marco (the applicants) and the respondent, whose identity is not specified in the provided text. The dispute concerned an application for an interlocutory injunction. The matter was heard by Burchardt J in the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicants had established a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits to warrant the grant of an interlocutory injunction. This involved assessing whether the applicants had demonstrated a serious question to be tried and whether the balance of convenience favoured the grant of the injunction.

Burchardt J considered the evidence presented by both parties in relation to the alleged breaches of contract and the potential for irreparable harm. The court applied the established principles for granting interlocutory injunctions, requiring the applicants to show a serious question to be tried and that damages would not be an adequate remedy. The judge's reasoning focused on the specific facts of the case and the applicable contractual terms to determine if these thresholds were met.

The court ultimately granted the interlocutory injunction sought by the applicants.