MANDERVILLE & BORAH
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 2752
•26 September 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
MANDERVILLE & BORAH [2019] FCCA 2752
[2019] FCCA 2752
26 September 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In proceedings before Judge Spelleken, the applicant sought to join the father of the respondent to the proceedings. The nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed, but the application concerned the joinder of a party to existing family law proceedings.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the father of the respondent should be joined as a party to the proceedings. This required the court to consider the relevant provisions of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the joinder of parties and the principles governing such applications.
The court dismissed the application filed on 25 February 2019. The judgment was published under the pseudonym Manderville & Borah, with approval granted pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
The central legal issue before the court was whether the father of the respondent should be joined as a party to the proceedings. This required the court to consider the relevant provisions of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) concerning the joinder of parties and the principles governing such applications.
The court dismissed the application filed on 25 February 2019. The judgment was published under the pseudonym Manderville & Borah, with approval granted pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
MANDERVILLE & BORAH [2019] FCCA 2752
Most Recent Citation
BAO & QUADE [2021] FCCA 630
Cases Citing This Decision
2
BAO & QUADE
[2021] FCCA 630
Borah & Manderville (No 3)
[2020] FCCA 3248
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
3
Chen & Tan
[2012] FamCA 225
Teo & Guan
[2015] FamCAFC 94
Bishop & Bishop
[2003] FamCA 240