Mancini and Mancini (No. 2)

In *Mancini and Mancini (No. 2)*, the husband sought an order for costs, while the wife had a pending appeal. The matter came before Justice Rose.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the husband's application for costs at that stage, given the wife's pending appeal.

Justice Rose adjourned the husband's application for costs. The court reasoned that it was more appropriate to determine the costs of the adjournment after the wife's appeal had been resolved. The wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs for the adjournment in the sum of $1,439.00 by 5.00pm on 15 July 2008.