[2013] FWCA 3950 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Manchester Tank & Equipment Pty Ltd.
(AG2013/1478)
MANCHESTER TANK & EQUIPMENT PTY LTD. (AUST) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 19 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Manchester Tank & Equipment Pty Ltd. (Aust) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Manchester Tank & Equipment Pty Ltd. (Aust) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Manchester Tank & Equipment Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 26 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401881 PR538017>
- AGLC
- Manchester Tank & Equipment Pty Ltd. [2013] FWCA 3950
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3950
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission involved the compliance of the agreement with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements for approval, including whether it facilitated the efficient operation of the business, ensured fairness for employees, and adhered to the procedural prerequisites outlined in the Act. Furthermore, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and if the necessary procedural fairness was observed in its formation.
After examining the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the Commission concluded that the agreement largely complied with the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms for employees, and it did not hinder the efficient operation of the business. Additionally, the Commission found that the procedural fairness had been observed during the negotiation process. Consequently, the Commission approved the Manchester Tank & Equipment Pty Ltd. (Aust) Enterprise Agreement 2013, thereby resolving the dispute in favour of the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.