| [2014] FWCA 7339 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/9179)
MAMMOET AUSTRALIA PTY LTD HENDERSON ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 16 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd Henderson Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd Henderson Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 14 October 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410691 PR556695>
- AGLC
- Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7339
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7339
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement sufficiently outlined the terms and conditions of employment, whether it provided for a fair and reasonable safety net of minimum terms and conditions, and if the agreement was genuinely negotiated. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement provided adequate protections and benefits to employees, ensuring they were not worse off overall than under the applicable awards.
In delivering its decision, the Commission emphasised the importance of the "better off overall test," which requires that employees be no worse off overall under an enterprise agreement than they would be under the relevant award or safety net provisions. The Commission found that the agreement in question met the statutory criteria, as it provided for a comprehensive set of terms and conditions, including provisions on wages, leave, and other employment matters. Furthermore, the Commission concluded that the agreement had been fairly negotiated, with evidence supporting the involvement of both parties in reaching the terms of the agreement. The Commission approved the agreement, finding it met the necessary requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.