Malek Group Pty Ltd v Warringah Council

Case [2015] NSWLEC 1502


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Malek Group Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2015] NSWLEC 1502
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 12 October 2015
Date of orders: 02 December 2015
Decision date: 02 December 2015
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Fakes C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Child care centre; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Malek Group Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Warringah Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Applicant: Ms R McCulloch (Solicitor)
Respondent: Mr S Patterson (Solicitor)

  Solicitors:
Pikes & Verekers Lawyers(Applicant)
Wiltshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):10582 of 2015

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

…………….

Judy Fakes

Commissioner of the Court

10582 of 2015 s34 orders (72.0 KB, pdf)

10582 of 2015 conditions (324 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Malek Group Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2015] NSWLEC 1502
Case
[2015] NSWLEC 1502
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Malek Group Pty Ltd, the appellant, filed an appeal against Warringah Council, the respondent, in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The appeal pertains to a dispute concerning the council's refusal to approve the appellant's development application for a residential apartment building. The appellant sought to build on a property in Manly, Sydney, and claimed that the council's decision was unlawful and constituted an abuse of power.

The legal issues before the court encompassed whether the council had correctly applied the relevant planning laws and policies in denying the appellant's development application, and whether the council's decision was unreasonable. The appellant argued that the council's decision was based on an incorrect interpretation of the planning laws and that the decision was not rationally connected to the statutory purpose.

In its decision, the court examined the relevant planning laws and policies, and the evidence presented by both parties. The court concluded that the council had correctly applied the planning laws and policies in denying the appellant's development application. The court found that the council's decision was rationally connected to the statutory purpose and was not an abuse of power. The court further found that the appellant had not demonstrated that the council's decision was unreasonable.

As a result, the court dismissed the appeal and upheld the council's decision. The court found that the council's decision to deny the appellant's development application was lawful and reasonable. The court ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.