Malbasa v Insurance Australia trading as NRMA Insurance

The New South Wales Court of Appeal considered an application for leave to appeal brought by Malbasa against Insurance Australia trading as NRMA Insurance. The nature of the underlying dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the application itself concerned whether an appeal should be permitted.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the matter raised a question of principle that warranted the granting of leave to appeal. The catchwords indicate that the application was opposed on the basis that no such matter of principle was involved.

The Court of Appeal, comprising Macfarlan and Barrett JJA, determined that the application did not present a matter of principle. Consequently, leave to appeal was refused.

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.