Makowska v St George Community Housing Ltd
Case
•
[2022] NSWCA 5
•07 February 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Makowska v St George Community Housing Ltd [2022] NSWCA 5
[2022] NSWCA 5
07 February 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Ms Makowska, sought judicial review of a decision made by St George Community Housing Ltd. The dispute concerned the applicant's tenancy and the respondent's obligations as a concurrent lessee. The matter was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the respondent had committed a jurisdictional error or an error of law on the face of the record, and whether, in any event, relief should be refused on discretionary grounds. This latter issue arose due to the applicant's failure to avail herself of a statutory right of appeal and her lack of a satisfactory explanation for this omission, which also appeared to avoid the need to obtain leave to appeal.
The Court of Appeal found that no jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record had been demonstrated by the applicant. Furthermore, the Court considered the discretionary factors relevant to the grant of relief. It noted the applicant's failure to pursue the statutory appeal route and the absence of a satisfactory explanation for this course of action. The Court concluded that, in these circumstances, it was not appropriate to grant the relief sought.
Accordingly, the summons dated 27 July 2021 was dismissed with costs.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the respondent had committed a jurisdictional error or an error of law on the face of the record, and whether, in any event, relief should be refused on discretionary grounds. This latter issue arose due to the applicant's failure to avail herself of a statutory right of appeal and her lack of a satisfactory explanation for this omission, which also appeared to avoid the need to obtain leave to appeal.
The Court of Appeal found that no jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record had been demonstrated by the applicant. Furthermore, the Court considered the discretionary factors relevant to the grant of relief. It noted the applicant's failure to pursue the statutory appeal route and the absence of a satisfactory explanation for this course of action. The Court concluded that, in these circumstances, it was not appropriate to grant the relief sought.
Accordingly, the summons dated 27 July 2021 was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Contract Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Breach
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
High Court Bulletin [2022] HCAB 4
Cases Citing This Decision
3
GHZ v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force
[2025] NSWSC 1091
Makowska v St George Community Housing Limited
[2024] NSWSC 1243
High Court Bulletin
[2022] HCAB 4
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
9
Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
[1995] HCA 10
Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
[1995] HCA 10
Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
[1995] HCA 10