Makfam Pty Ltd v CV Australia Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2020] VSC 296
•29 May 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Makfam Pty Ltd v CV Australia Pty Ltd [2020] VSC 296
[2020] VSC 296
29 May 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Makfam Pty Ltd sought an order to prevent CV Australia Pty Ltd from being represented in an oppression claim by a former solicitor, Mr. Cohen, who had previously represented Makfam. The dispute came before the court which had to determine whether Mr. Cohen was in possession of confidential information that would prevent him from acting for CV Australia, and whether he should be restrained from doing so in the interests of the administration of justice. The court examined the circumstances under which Mr. Cohen had acted for Makfam and the nature of the information he may have acquired during that period. It considered whether the information was confidential and whether it was relevant to the oppression claim. The court concluded that the information Mr. Cohen may have possessed was not confidential and did not pertain specifically to the oppression claim. Therefore, there were no grounds to restrain him from acting for CV Australia. The application was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Legal Privilege
-
Abuse of Process
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Emerald Resources (WA) Pty Ltd v Mullan [2025] FCA 1049
Cases Citing This Decision
10
DECOLA & DECOLA
[2020] FamCA 884
GCM Graphite Pty Ltd v NH3 Clean Energy Limited
[2025] WASC 448
Walthamstow Pty Ltd v Caratti [No 2]
[2023] WASC 363
Cases Cited
25
Statutory Material Cited
0
Técnicas Reunidas SA v Andrew
[2018] NSWCA 192
Kallinicos v Hunt
[2005] NSWSC 1181
Sent v John Fairfax Publication Pty Ltd
[2002] VSC 429