Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District
Case
•
[2019] NSWSC 715
•14 June 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District [2019] NSWSC 715
[2019] NSWSC 715
14 June 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, the plaintiff alleged that she suffered a dislocated arm from a horse bite and that the defendants failed to order imaging to identify a rotator cuff injury, did not refer her to an orthopaedic specialist, and did not advise her on proper care for her shoulder. The plaintiff claimed that these failures constituted medical negligence and that her injuries were exacerbated by her own contributory negligence in performing farm work against medical advice. The court was required to determine whether the defendants were liable for the plaintiff's injuries and, if so, the quantum of damages to be awarded.
The court considered whether the defendants breached their duty of care by failing to order imaging, refer the plaintiff to an orthopaedic specialist, and advise her on proper care for her shoulder. It found that the defendants did not breach their duty of care in these respects. The court also considered whether the plaintiff's contributory negligence in performing farm work against medical advice barred her recovery. It found that her actions did not bar her recovery but reduced her damages by 25%.
The court assessed the quantum of damages, considering economic loss, costs of past and future care, and costs of caring for animals. It found that the defendants were liable for the cost of maintaining the plaintiff's unprofitable business. The court awarded the plaintiff damages for economic loss, costs of past and future care, and costs of caring for animals. The court also awarded damages for the cost of maintaining the plaintiff's unprofitable business, reduced by 25% for contributory negligence.
The court considered whether the defendants breached their duty of care by failing to order imaging, refer the plaintiff to an orthopaedic specialist, and advise her on proper care for her shoulder. It found that the defendants did not breach their duty of care in these respects. The court also considered whether the plaintiff's contributory negligence in performing farm work against medical advice barred her recovery. It found that her actions did not bar her recovery but reduced her damages by 25%.
The court assessed the quantum of damages, considering economic loss, costs of past and future care, and costs of caring for animals. It found that the defendants were liable for the cost of maintaining the plaintiff's unprofitable business. The court awarded the plaintiff damages for economic loss, costs of past and future care, and costs of caring for animals. The court also awarded damages for the cost of maintaining the plaintiff's unprofitable business, reduced by 25% for contributory negligence.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tort Law
Legal Concepts
-
Negligence
-
Contributory Negligence
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Personal Injury
-
Economic Loss
-
Duty of Care
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Forrest v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2025] NSWPIC 206
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District
[2021] NSWCA 107
Sivonen v Smith
[2023] NSWSC 984
Makaroff v Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (No 2)
[2019] NSWSC 1043
Cases Cited
38
Statutory Material Cited
3
Re Hillsea Pty Ltd
[2019] NSWSC 1152
Re Hillsea Pty Ltd
[2019] NSWSC 1152
The Nominal Defendant v Cordin
[2017] NSWCA 6