[2013] FWCA 8605 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
MAK Industrial Water Solutions Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9826)
MAK INDUSTRIAL WATER SOLUTIONS PTY LTD QUEENLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 31 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the MAK Industrial Water Solutions Pty Ltd Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MAK Industrial Water Solutions Pty Ltd Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by MAK Industrial Water Solutions Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 7 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 November 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405121 PR544050>
- AGLC
- MAK Industrial Water Solutions Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 8605
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8605
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement complied with the various statutory provisions of the Fair Work Act. This included assessing whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it contained the required minimum terms and conditions of employment, and whether it was free from any invalid or unlawful provisions. Additionally, the Commission needed to determine whether the agreement was made with appropriate levels of employee and employer representation.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission determined that the employer had failed to bargain in good faith with the union, and that the agreement contained several invalid and unlawful provisions. These included provisions that were deemed to be outside the scope of the agreement's coverage, as well as clauses that contravened minimum wage and penalty rate entitlements. As a result, the application for approval was dismissed, and the proposed agreement was not registered. The Commission's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence presented and the application of relevant legal principles under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.