Majak v Rose (No 7)
Case
•
[2017] NSWCA 276
•24 October 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Majak v Rose (No 7) [2017] NSWCA 276
[2017] NSWCA 276
24 October 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Majak v Rose (No 7)*, the proceeding before Payne JA concerned an application for costs. The respondent sought their costs in the cause.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether the respondent should be awarded their costs of the motion.
Payne JA determined that there was no issue of principle involved in the costs application. Consequently, the Court ordered that the costs of the motion be the respondent’s costs in the cause.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether the respondent should be awarded their costs of the motion.
Payne JA determined that there was no issue of principle involved in the costs application. Consequently, the Court ordered that the costs of the motion be the respondent’s costs in the cause.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Majak v Rose (No 7) [2017] NSWCA 276
Most Recent Citation
Roos v R [2019] NSWCCA 67
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Majak v Rose (No 6)
[2017] NSWCA 262
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Latoudis v Casey
[1990] HCA 59