Maier and Tunnecliff

In the matter of *Maier and Tunnecliff*, heard by Cronin J, the father had filed a contravention application against the mother. The specific details of the underlying dispute and the nature of the alleged contravention are not provided in the extract.

The primary legal issue before the court was the father's contravention application. The court was required to determine whether this application should proceed or be struck out.

Cronin J ordered that the father's contravention application be struck out. The court also made orders regarding the mother's costs for the day, fixing them at $4092 and reserving them to the trial judge for the outstanding substantive parenting case. Further orders directed the mother's solicitor to provide a certified copy of previous orders to the Associate to Judge Curtain and extended a specific paragraph of prior orders until further notice. The reasons for the day's decision were to be transcribed and made available to the parties.